|
While working in one of the best places that have worked (in an American investment bank in the City of London) a thought occurred as in daydreaming. Then while occupied with it, surprisingly the manager from the other side of the desk looked at me and out of the blue told me: “after what would happen the person cannot be happy any more”. Spontaneously I replied “a person always must try to be happy”. Probably he felt satisfied (even comforted for his own reasons), though wondering, and he continued his computer work replying nothing.
After more than two decades since then wondering “what was this about? I did not have any conversation with the manager the whole day about anything, if only for a technical thing. What he was talking about?” And even worse, enormous regret that did not ask him to explain what he meant.
Another day a colleague seating on the other side of the desk and near to the manager, said to him: “whenever this happen, some people go away and hide, others go away and write books or change profession, others shoot us in the courts, but very few return”. Though for this particular instance to be honest, I was quite blur from the daydreaming and cannot be sure if that was spoken from the colleague or from my daydreaming.
For the sake of the Kingdom, let the office of the Monarchy ask him.
For the sake of the Presidency and the two fallen towers, let the office of the Presidency ask him.
Also for the sake of the Anglo American Freemasonry, let ask him. Let ask the manager.
Because a tragedy is one thing, but a systematic tragedy is another.
And when that systematic burden is sustained by the innocents for decades, it would not last much.
The issue is that although heavens (either perfect or not) do their own work, the human authorities must always be bounded and be accountable by the written law.
On a personal level witnessed and report, earlier, now and ever, the fall of the British authorities (about a month before the fall of the two towers) with a “mock execution” towards an innocent and almost impeccable person and British citizen. A spell for a “fatal injection” by the authorities, that resulted in a piece of excrement on the tongue. I report it until 3 questions get answered:
(1) Can the British government confirm that the spell of the “fatal injection” indeed happened by British police officers on duty in their police station? The police in Britain dictates the length of time for complaining about something against them, to up to 1 year after the event. Can the government then bypass the police and consult the secret services MI5 or MI6 to get a confirmation that this happened? Especially since during the “mock execution”, it happened Richter-like hits and shocks (under another spell) resembling in a way the fall of tower-walls that happened about a month later on.
Also (though not necessary) to confirm whether there was a video during the “fatal injection”, in which case they could confirm also the piece of excrement on the tongue.
There were about 4 policemen around me at the Battersea Bridge police station in London (2 August 2001).
The code names of the police officers appearing in the police report of the arresting (because after an unprecedented hit, I did some noise in the park) are: Arresting Officer PC 0128/BT BUTLER, BTP; Custody Officer PS 0085/WW LONG, BATTERSEA; and Officer in Case PC 0128/BT BUTLER, BTP. There is no word written in the police report for the "fatal injection" and for the setting of the scene for the "mock execution".
As I learn from my books, I request from the Heavens and Earth that rule Britain and all the earth, to ask life for life from the police officer in charge who commanded the "mock execution". Unless any of them come forward and confess. And also if they wish say if they were following commands from superiors (or police protocol) or it was from themselves.
(2) Can the British government confirm that the spell of the “fatal injection” was a violation of the British law? Can they confirm what I was told by a senior person of the Citizen’s Advice Bureau: “those people (the British police officers) broke the law and you are entitled to compensation”?.
(3) Can the British government confirm a compensation? A financial level that covers the basic daily necessities would be very much appreciated and enough.
Otherwise no need for any word of sorry or an apology.
My puzzle though in good conscience is that I had gone to that American bank to see a doctor after had left from a stealthy silent (and with history of problems) French bank where I could not speak their language (with links to a private bank in the country of my birth with manners of Mafia, where I was invited to work after the American bank, as a head of a department and I resigned in 3 months). But it happened that I did some exceptional good work in that American bank (which was appreciated), even under the anaesthetic of the doctors (or the daydreaming). But authorities breaking the law is another issue. A Mafia leading issue.
|